Xbox Game Studios |OT3| Once more....with feeling (Part 1)

[Eduardo]

@DeoGame

Fingers crossed for SquareEnix Europe

[javycane]

@Eduardo

Fingers crossed for SquareEnix Europe

On my KNEES

[LucasTaves]

@Ironfistchinmi

No two deals are the same. Spider-man was a case of Marvel going to Sony and stating “pick a hero”, then Sony approached Insomniac. J Stevenson explained it a couple of times on Resetera, it’s just wilful ignorance to suggest otherwise at this point, as it makes sense Marvel would do such a thing given PS4’s dominance in the console space last-gen.

I think this Indiana Jones deal was definitely at least in the works before Bethesda got bought out, so it really depends on what was agreed upon when they signed it off. We’ll see, but I’m leaning towards exclusive, but in any case, it’ll be on Game Pass day one.

He could have told that story 1000 times and would still reek of BS.

Specially in light of the Avengers situation where the developers flat out said that given the movie rights the only choice they had was to make Spiderman exclusive to Playstation or don’t have him at all.

I mean, Sony didn’t acknowledged there was a deal for the films in the first place, we only knew about it because of the hacks, and it’s also the same company that always put their public image first (like the we have the only true next gen games situation and they are totally impossible to run on ps4)

[2021ERA]

Regarding Indiana Jones exclusivity. I feel that if the game is a Multi Plat then why should MS/XGS/Bethesda waste resources on developing games for the competition? If Indy is MP then imo XGS should just let Lucas Film Games develop it. XGS should use their devs to develop exclusives that entice people into their eco system. Let Bethesda/MGG work on an XB exclusive. Now if Indy is an Xbox exclusive then this would be similar to Spiderman Exclusivity. It could possibly entice fans of the movie series into the XB ecosystem.

[Munki]

@Mort

Everyone. Get everyone.

Damn right.

[Hindle]

MS need more third person developers and Crystal Dynamics fit this bill. Get them and Eidios Montreal from Square

[javycane]

@Hindle

MS need more third person developers and Crystal Dynamics fit this bill. Get them and Eidios Montreal from Square

Microsoft needs more games irrelevant of the camera angle. I dont get why you people care so much about that aspect.

[Opatschi]

@javycane

Microsoft needs more games irrelevant of the camera angle. I dont get why you people care so much about that aspect.

[javycane]

@Opatschi

Somehow quality barometer starts with a camera angle

[Opatschi]

@javycane

Somehow quality barometer starts with a camera angle

Best stealth games are in first person PROVE ME WRONG

[uouit_iyyur]

Interesting tweet by Brad Sams…

I think MS is going to buy an expensive studio/publisher.

[Hindle]

@javycane

Microsoft needs more games irrelevant of the camera angle. I dont get why you people care so much about that aspect.

Obviously. And to me the camera is irreverent. However there are a lot of gamers who love third person games and they should be catered to

[MaskoPower]

I think it’s safe to announce the game’s camera even if we still have years to hear about the project.

[Opatschi]

@Hindle

Obviously. And to me the camera is irreverent. However there are a lot of gamers who love third person games and they should be catered to

If machine games want to they will if not they won’t. I mean Indy work in first and third person

[Hindle]

@Opatschi

If machine games want to they will if not they won’t. I mean Indy work in first and third person

I’ve literally said in the other thread that Indy will be first person and play much like Riddick escape from Butcher Bay

[ProgStopper]

I know Brad focuses exclusively on Microsoft, but are we sure that Tweet is for us?

Then again Klobrille did respond. So maybe?

[Opatschi]

@Hindle

I’ve literally said in the other thread that Indy will be first person and play much like Riddick escape from Butcher Bay

I mean Wolfenstein has a lot aspects that are very common with Indy. Time period, style, nazis…

[Ironfistchinmi]

@LucasTaves

He could have told that story 1000 times and would still reek of BS.

Specially in light of the Avengers situation where the developers flat out said that given the movie rights the only choice they had was to make Spiderman exclusive to Playstation or don’t have him at all.

I mean, Sony didn’t acknowledged there was a deal for the films in the first place, we only knew about it because of the hacks, and it’s also the same company that always put their public image first (like the we have the only true next gen games situation and they are totally impossible to run on ps4)

The deal for Spider-Man game appearances is down to Marvel, not Sony Pictures, so they probably dictated that for The Avengers game. Anyway, I had it the wrong way round and Marvel approached Insomniac.

How Insomniac’s Spider-Man Came to Be - IGN Unfiltered - IGN

Last Spider-Man post, as this is the Xbox thread!

[solis74]

@DeoGame

hmmm this means multiple companies trying to buy IP’s - stadia/amazon/ms/sony/google???

[Opatschi]

@solis74

hmmm this means multiple companies trying to buy IP’s - stadia/amazon/ms/sony/google???

This is the Endgame. Xbox was clever this time. Now all those companies will go up VERY high in prices… Private gaming companies are going to be valued like giants.