Good choice. I love the game but felt Stealth with Emily was a tad clunkier. Only thing is that the good Emily story is great, so maybe primarily non-violent action with minimized death? Up to you
Zelda and Xenoblade are one of my fav. franchise :o Im lonning for a collection on switch… thought Im more a fan of the classic Zeldas.
1 Like
nahh I go the extra route. It was the most fun in Dishonerd one and as I said I plan to play with Emily too. One negative is that I dont like the German voice of Corvo. Also I play on hard soo I kinda need Corvo…
The lvl design is what moved me through the game the story so far has been good enough but honestly I ignored most of it in Part one. This is a testerment how good the lvl design actually is as it made me forget the story.
1 Like
Er, no. I have a Switch and a bunch of games, it just isn’t for me. Some games are ok, like Luigi’s Mansion 3 which i enjoyed. I just found their games to be meh and very, very overrated for the most part. Put that together with all the other things that bothered me about the console and ecosystem; joycons suck (I got three with drifting until I stopped bothering replacing them), their online services and everything related to that sucks, it’s expensive as hell for what you get, customer support was really bad, hardware was very weak etc etc.
The one really good thing was the portability, but now I have proper games on a more powerful device (my phone, lol) via xCloud for that.
I really tried to get into it, bought everything and tried lots of stuff but in the end it’s not for me. 7-year old me would have loved it though! But, I have 0 nostalgia for Nintendo which I think is a must to enjoy it as an adult, the Switch was my first (and last) Nintendo console.
1 Like
1 Like
I’m probably the least enthused with Google’s gaming offering out of the big companies, but I guess we’ll see what happens.
1 Like
Oh no please no
1 Like
For Amazon Luna and Stadia, buying those kind of big companies would be bad for them, thats because they don’t have a big enough user base, and making re exclusive, for example, will only give them the contempt of the gaming community. Their best choice its to take small or Middle size studios and hope one of them make a hit, like Microsoft with bungie in their first generation.
1 Like
DO NOT DARE TAKE CAPCOM. 
If Amazon or Google takes a major publisher, they better be ready to go multiplat or sell these guys to another firm/spin them off. The last thing I want is Stadia or Luna to flop in spite of these purchases and the studios to go down with them. Nothing Google or Amazon has done in the gaming space gives me the confidence that they will do right by their purchases. Now, will I try Stadia or Luna if they bought these devs, most likely. The barrier to entry is pretty low. But those with shit internet may very well not and if you botch your servers during a big launch it may go worse. Cloud gaming is the future as an option, not the default.
2 Likes
I’ll propose it again: Square Enix-Capcom would be the ultimate Japanese publisher power couple. Kiss and marry already if even more consolidation is this decade’s trend. I don’t think either would be a great fit for any of the major players.
Yep exactly
1 Like
Nope because sony will money hat like nuts
Even if cloud gaming its the future, they can have more players and be in more countries with a Luna box / stadia box. The fact that Luna its only in the states and Stadia in few countries between the states and the EU, means that buying some kind of big publisher its not going to give them a big user base at the start, because their streaming platforms are only in few countries and every one outside have a shitty Internet enough to avoid that at least for the next 7 years.
1 Like
Bingo. Being able to download the games to PC would be a start. Idk, I think MS is right in testing the waters instead of betting the farm on the cloud.
1 Like
They’re being very smart about it, they’ve learned from their past mistakes in moving too quickly and being ahead of the times. They know cloud gaming is the future of gaming, even if not for the current “hard-core” gamers, but it’s not yet ready for prime-time. The ecosystem and infrastructure aren’t fully there, but they also can’t just dip their toes in the water or they’ll fall behind, so they’re rolling it out in a very measured and controlled fashion, creating the right partnerships and building up their studios so that when the infrastructure is finally ready, they’ll be the first and only ones to have all the pieces together. They’re going to fight very hard to keep that plan together, as tens-to-hundreds of billions of dollars in future annual revenue are at stake.
1 Like
I just tried Minecraft crossplay (Switch and Xbox) and I’m very impressed. This was my first experience doing crossplay with someone i know and it feels revolutionary. I wish every game had it.
If Google/Amazon acquire development studios or publishers, im just hoping that they end up being ones I don’t have any interest in. lol.
1 Like
Lol
They aren’t a company too big to fail and they get flak, just look at Wii U and how it fared among fans and wider market. But they offer something unique so people are forced to ignore many things.