Microsoft-Activision-Blizzard Discussion Thread (Part 1)

What does it mean?

But still interesting to see how diversified Microsoft is becoming. It was already pretty diverse before, but now it is even bigger.

1 Like

Sorry. I was using wrestling terminology. Basically, it means the hero/good guy of the storyline; someone the people will root for.

1 Like

God imagine if the games industry was more like wrestling. Bethesda announces Starfield, Sony is trying to get timed exclusivity and all of a sudden Microsoft’s theme music starts playing “BY GAWD, THAT’S MICROSOFT’S THEME MUSIC. IT’S MICROSOFT WITH THE STEEL CHAIR”. All I’m saying is E3 would be a lot more fun.

7 Likes

Reading the EC phases information and noticed certain term.

“ The Commission keeps the merging companies informed about the progress if its analysis. Towards the end of phase I, a “STATE-OF-PLAY meeting” is typically held, where the Commission informs them about the results of the phase I investigation. If there are competition concerns, companies can offer remedies, which extends the phase I deadline by 10 working days”

Xbox to appear at a State of Play confirmed!

5 Likes

State of Play

:stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

3 Likes

Well

We need some Windows launch music :rofl:

5 Likes

Lol!!

Yeah, this was always gonna be the outcome to expect. MS already has agreed to concessions and will happily make more if need be. The deal for ABK is not principally about Game Pass or even Xbox per se, it is about revenue streams. It was never a part of their long-term strategic growth plans for Xbox/GP until the opportunity fell in their lap. That’s why MS will gladly make more concessions as needed.

MS will likely end up conceding that: PSX will keep getting CoD games thru a recurring set of contracts inked every few yrs; MS will not favor Xbox in any way wrt Azure access when Sony wants to utilize that; and that Game Pass will keep its entry point pricing fixed for 5yrs or so.

And like I said, MS doesn’t mind these at all as these were already things they planned to do anyhow. They want the boost to reliable cash flow ABK gives them, which can then be invested into Xbox year after year.

4 Likes

25 Likes

ABK is the literal monkeys paw acquisition, lol.

1 Like

Not really. But depends on for whom…

Ah, meant in the sense that Acquisition OT wanted acquisitions so much. And now that we’ve gotten one, the fun of talking seems to have waded after a sea of bad takes.

1 Like

For some maybe…I feel like that deal invigorated console warring more than anything else.

https://twitter.com/DonMemesio/status/1575810355229380608

Makes sense though as ABK deal changes the timeline.

9 Likes

Both of these are true IMO.

1 Like

The funniest part is that ABK was one of the acquisitions people were least enthused about before it happened.

70% of the people in here probably just want this era to end ASAP so MS can start buying more creatively rich studios again.

6 Likes

That’s probably a factor haha.

Fwiw, I always wanted MS to nab Blizzard so I won’t say no to Activision and King tagging along. Especially because they have incredible untapped potential.

10 Likes
4 Likes

yeah…no …this is utter nonsense

I think people need to a reality check here…there is no case of regulators ever telling a company “you must pay to fund something that will directly help your competitor”

Making ports of games cost $ to make. Regulator tells Microsoft to make a version for Playstation and MS says “alright cool, you gonna foot the bill for it?”

As far as MS making a recurring set of contracts the way you word it makes it seem like MS will have to ink a contract with Sony which isnagain pretty nonsensical. They may choose to offer to regnogiate with Sony when the deal is up but they certainly arent going to be force to do so and they may very well tell Sony to f’ck right off come 2027 and make COD exclusive

Again there is no instance of this ever happening in any industry. This just goes back to regulators not being there to protect Sony.

“Xbox in any way wrt Azure access when Sony wants to utilize that”

What do these have to do with each other? Also again you realize MS doesnt have to offer Azure to Sony right? Again you’re framing this as if regulators are there to protect Sony.

Sony isnt entitled to anything you’ve said so far

“and that Game Pass will keep its entry point pricing fixed for 5yrs”

Sure, lets ignore market flucation, currency value changes, inflation

JC you cant be serious with this

1 Like

Did this already happen with microsoft in the 90s? They were required to make Word for Mac

Im sure concessions may be made but most likely is keeping COD on Playstation for the rest of the gen (which would line up Phils 3 year offer) but the idea that MS would be forced to make a new deal with Sony is crap. MS can very well make COD exclusive after their deal is up. Will they? Hard to say but clearly MS is going to monitor the landscape and make an informed decision when that time comes

Game Pass price and giving Sony access to Azure is another level of nonsense. MS doesnt have give Sony anything nor are Sony entitled to anything