And that is with the Xbox tax. Phenomenal, and this is just the beginning.
If the media complains Xbox should come out and make a statement saying
âThis is not a practice we hoped to use, however our competition was very aggressive in this area and forced our hand despite our own wishes for multiplatform gaming.â

imagine getting an 80+ MC and still being âdividedâ

Man I hate how underappreciated Gears and Coalition are ![]()
I think with Gears, itâs less of underappreciation and more of stagnation of the franchise creeping up. But Coalition 100% is underappreciated and Iâm glad they are able to be doing something alongside Gears now, to test out UE5 and stretch their muscles a bit.
If you think critics are divided, then you should take a look at mankind
is that a mfin Deus Ex reference? ![]()
Man the Gears universe can have so much variety of genres. Of course the much asked for Gears horror game. But I really want a mech game in that universe, the mech segments in 4&5&HB were so good, and they were just segments. Theyâd kick ass in a fully fledged AAA action game ![]()
Very exciting! I hope itâs something really juicy.
Same, everything people suggested here would make me ecstatic
Yes and I actually thought your comment was too ![]()
Yeah, I feel itâs time the gloves come off.
I really donât want get very excited. A Splinter Cell funded by Microsoft vs one that is greenlit and funded by Ubisoft look like theyâd be different games, and Ubisoftâs one is unlikely to interest me.
I forget, but wasnât the rumor that an outside studio was doing Splinter Cell for Ubisoft? Not one of their internals?
I could be mixed up.
I mean, if Ubisoft made a Splinter Cell game in the same old Ubisoft formula I doubt that they would need MS support. This game will probably break the âUbisoft formulaâ and thatâs why they are using MS funding.
![]()
IOI Hitman team could make it
just speculating
Arenât they making 007?